Case Report

Trio of Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis, Right Posterior Septal Accessory Pathway and Atrial Flutter: A Case Report

Register or Login to View PDF Permissions
Permissions× For commercial reprint enquiries please contact Springer Healthcare:

For permissions and non-commercial reprint enquiries, please visit to start a request.

For author reprints, please email
Information image
Average (ratings)
No ratings
Your rating


A 57-year-old man presented with recurrent palpitations. He was diagnosed with rheumatic mitral stenosis, right posterior septal accessory pathway and atrial flutter. An electrophysiological study after percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy showed that the palpitations were due to atrial flutter with right bundle branch aberrancy. The right posterior septal pathway was a bystander because it had a higher refractory period than the atrioventricular node.

Disclosure:The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.



Published online:

Informed Consent:

Patient Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.

Correspondence Details:Ramachandra Barik, Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, Pin-751019, India. E:

Open Access:

This work is open access under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License which allows users to copy, redistribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is cited correctly.

In India, the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease in the general population is 1.5–2.0 per 1,000.1,2 However, based on echocardiography, the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease is likely to be greater.3 The prevalence of Wolff–Parkinson–White (WPW) syndrome or the WPW pattern in the general population ranges from 0.1 to 0.3%, with a higher prevalence among men than women.4 The coexistence of rheumatic mitral stenosis and WPW syndrome is so rare that a search of the literature using Google Scholar and PubMed yielded 17 cases between 1960 and 2021. Among these, balloon mitral valvotomy and radiofrequency ablation were performed simultaneously in only two cases.5,6

Case Report

A 57-year-old man presented with a three-decade history of recurrent episodes of palpitation with alarming jugular venous pulsation, but without syncope. Each episode spontaneously reverted to the normal sinus rhythm 6–8 hours after the onset. Cardiac auscultation raised the suspicion of underlying rheumatic mitral stenosis. A 12-lead ECG was suggestive of a WPW pattern with a right posterior septal accessory pathway (Figure 1A). A chest X-ray in the posterior–anterior view was consistent with cardiac auscultation (Figure 1B). A transoesophageal echocardiogram confirmed rheumatic mitral stenosis (Figure 2A and Supplementary Material Video 1). The pliable mitral valve area was 0.8 cm2 and the mean gradient was 17 mmHg at a heart rate of 87 BPM. The coronary angiogram was normal.

An electrophysiologist, cardiothoracic surgeon, cardiac anaesthetist and cardiologist suggested mitral valvotomy followed by ablation of the accessory pathway in a single procedure if possible to avoid repeated septal puncture. Informed consent was obtained for the procedure.

The day before the procedure, the patient developed an episode of palpitation during the clinical round. A 12-lead ECG revealed atrial flutter with right bundle branch aberrancy on metoprolol succinate (Figure 2B). The patient’s blood pressure was 124/80 mmHg. Oral verapamil was initiated and the atrial flutter reverted to normal sinus rhythm.

On the day of the procedure, the first balloon mitral valvotomy was performed from a right femoral approach using a 23–26 mm Accura balloon (Vascular Concepts) after transeptal access using an 8 Fr SL-1 sheath and a BRK-0 needle (St Jude Medical). A transeptal puncture was performed after proper needle tip position was confirmed by fluoroscopy (right anterior oblique, left anterior oblique and 90° lateral views) and transoesophageal echocardiography (bicaval and short axis views; Figure 3A). The mean left atrial pressure prior to the valvotomy was 31 mmHg. The balloon was inflated to 26 mm in the right anterior oblique 20° position under fluoroscopy (Figure 3B) because the patient was 160 cm tall. The mitral valve area increased to 2.2 cm2 without any additional mitral regurgitation, and the mean left atrial pressure decreased to 12 mmHg without any mitral valve gradient. Immediate transthoracic echocardiography showed that the mitral valve gradient had decreased to 7/2 mmHg with negligible mitral regurgitation.

The left atrial wire was reintroduced into the left atrium before the stretched balloon was removed from the left atrium for the electrophysiological study and for possible radiofrequency ablation (Figure 3C). The electrophysiologist proceeded with the ablation plan.

ECG and Chest X-Ray

Article image

Transesophagial Echocardiography and ECG During Palpitation

Article image

Because the patient had baseline pre-excitation through the right posterior septal path and atrial flutter with orthodromic conduction with right bundle branch aberration, one decapolar catheter in the coronary sinus and a quadripolar catheter in the right ventricle were used to study the effective refractory period (ERP) of the accessory pathway rather than using the routine four electrophysiology catheters (three quadripolar [high right atrial, His bundle, right ventricle apex] and one decapolar catheter in the coronary sinus; Figure 4C). The supra-His conduction time was 65 ms and the infra-His conduction time was 9 ms. The baseline ECG was suggestive of a right posterior septal pathway. Right ventricular pacing showed eccentric conduction up to 450 ms, which suggested a retrograde pathway ERP of 450 ms. On pacing the integrated pathway, the ERP was found to be 450 ms. Due to the weak nature of the accessory pathway, ablation was not performed. On rapid atrial pacing, atrial flutter with right bundle branch aberrancy was induced, similar to the clinical tachycardia observed earlier. Ablation for the atrial flutter was not performed, and the patient was maintained on metoprolol succinate and an oral anticoagulant in the anticipation of spontaneous remission of atrial flutter after both remodelling of the atrium and haemodynamic improvement after balloon valvotomy.

This patient has remained asymptomatic over a follow-up period of 15 months.


Balloon mitral valvotomy is preferred to surgery in the case of pliable rheumatic stenosis. Of the treatments available for valvular AF, less is known about the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation because of the lack of a significant number of randomised control trials.7 Arrhythmia-related death in asymptomatic pre-excitation is as low as 0.05 to 0.9 per 1,000.8 Therefore, the treatment of rheumatic mitral stenosis with bystander involvement of an accessory pathway and an ERP that is greater than that of the atrioventricular node is not a challenge. Ablation of the accessory pathway is not indicated if the bystander pathway has a high ERP.9 In the present case, the patient had recurrent episodes of palpitation, but the right posterior septal accessory pathway did not contribute to these, which is quite an unusual scenario and unlike the case reported by Jagadheesan et al.10

Transsepetal Puncture for Balloon Mitral Valvotomy and Electrophysiology Study in One Go

Article image

Electrophysiology Study to Map the Accessory Pathway

Article image

Patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis who routinely seek help for fibrillation or flutter are in the 30- to 50-year age group, but the coexistence of a bystander right posterior septal accessory pathway, as in the present case, is unusual.11

The incidence of AF in a patient with an accessory pathway is 10–38%, but the association with common atrial flutter is not known.12 Our patient had orthodromic conduction of atrial flutter through the atrioventricular node because the coexisting right posterior septal pathway had an ERP of ≥450 ms. Neither the atrial flutter nor right posterior septal pathway were ablated, with the expectation that, during follow-up, both would become non-functional over time because of left atrial remodelling and favourable haemodynamic changes.13 It is well established that mitral stenosis causes AF, and the incidence of AF is higher in older age groups. It is also known that the results of balloon mitral valvotomy are worse in older patients because of persistent AF.14 Therefore, it has been suggested that balloon mitral valvotomy is performed at an early age for favourable atrial remodelling to reduce the occurrence of AF or atrial flutter.15


Palpitations caused by atrial flutter with right bundle branch aberrancy in a patient with rheumatic mitral stenosis and a right posterior septal accessory pathway with an ERP higher than that of the atrioventricular node are rare. Whether left atrial remodelling after percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy further reduces atrial flutter requires additional investigation in larger studies with a longer follow-up period.

Clinical Perspective

  • Severe rheumatic mitral stenosis associated with a right posterior septal accessory pathway is rare.
  • It is very unusual that recurrent palpitations are caused by atrial flutter with right bundle branch aberrancy; rather, palpitations are likely caused by right posterior septal accessory pathway-mediated Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome because the right posterior septal accessory pathway has a lower effective refractory period than the atrioventricular node.
  • Treating both conditions with a single intervention (i.e. by balloon mitral valvotomy and radiofrequency ablation) is rare.
  • The almost complete resolution of atrial flutter 15 months after balloon mitral valvotomy in this patient is an interesting finding.


  1. Kumar RK, Tandon R. Rheumatic fever & rheumatic heart disease: the last 50 years. Indian J Med Res 2013;137:643–58.
  2. Watkins DA, Johnson CO, Colquhoun SM, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of rheumatic heart disease, 1990–2015. N Engl J Med 2017;377:713–22.
    Crossref | PubMed
  3. Weinberg J, Beaton A, Aliku T, et al. Prevalence of rheumatic heart disease in African school-aged population: extrapolation from echocardiography screening using the 2012 World Heart Federation Guidelines. Int J Cardiol 2016;202:238–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  4. Hiss RG, Lamb LE. Electrocardiographic findings in 122,043 individuals. Circulation 1962;25:947–61.
    Crossref | PubMed
  5. Nwe N, K. Shein KK, Latt T. Mitral stenosis with WPW syndrome. J Arrhythmia 2011;27(Suppl):PE4_093.
  6. Alkindi F, Abed H, Thajudeen A, et al. Rheumatic mitral stenosis with incidental Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome: a rare association. Treated by percutaneous transmitral commissurotomy and radiofrequency ablation. Heart Views 2018;19:58–62.
    Crossref | PubMed
  7. Iung B, Leenhardt A, Extramiana F. Management of atrial fibrillation in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. Heart 2018;104:1062–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  8. Benson DW, Cohen MI. Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome: lessons learnt and lessons remaining. Cardiol Young 2017;27(Suppl 1):S62–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  9. Brugada J, Keegan R. Asymptomatic ventricular pre-excitation: between sudden cardiac death and catheter ablation. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 2018;7:32–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  10. Jagadheesan KS, Rangasamy S, Selvaraj RJ. A deadly mix – rheumatic mitral stenosis, preexcited atrial fibrillation, left atrial appendage thrombus and left atrial appendage accessory pathway. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2017;17:183–5.
    Crossref | PubMed
  11. Strasser T, Dondog N, El Kholy A, et al. The community control of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease: report of a WHO international cooperative project. Bull World Health Orga. 1981;59:285–94.
  12. Kobza R, Toggweiler S, Dillier R, et al. Prevalence of preexcitation in a young population of male Swiss conscripts. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2011;34:949–53.
    Crossref | PubMed
  13. Iliceto N, Ginevrino P, Leone A. Mitral stenosis and the Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome. (ECG findings in a case treated with commissurotomy with long-term disappearance of the pre-excitation syndrome). Acta Chir Ital 1968;24:695–712 [in Italian].
  14. Aslanabadi N, Ghaffari S, Khezerlouy Aghdam N, et al. Poor outcome following percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 2016;8:126–31.
    Crossref | PubMed
  15. Shaw TR, Sutaria N, Prendergast B. Clinical and haemodynamic profiles of young, middle aged, and elderly patients with mitral stenosis undergoing mitral balloon valvotomy. Heart 2003;89:1430–6.
    Crossref | PubMed