Original Research

Defining Procedural MI After Cardiac Surgery Using High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin: A Systematic Review

Register or Login to View PDF Permissions
Permissions× For commercial reprint enquiries please contact Springer Healthcare: ReprintsWarehouse@springernature.com.

For permissions and non-commercial reprint enquiries, please visit Copyright.com to start a request.

For author reprints, please email rob.barclay@radcliffe-group.com.
Information image
Average (ratings)
No ratings
Your rating

Abstract

Background: Procedural MI (PMI) is a critical determinant of clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery. While high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hscTn) is the most sensitive biomarker for detecting PMI, the clinical significance and optimal prognostic cut-off values for isolated hscTn elevations remain uncertain. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to evaluate the optimal cut-off levels of isolated hscTn elevation for defining prognostic PMI following cardiac surgery. Results: The review identified specific thresholds for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). For high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hscTnT), a cut-off of 120 × the upper reference limit (URL) was most optimal for predicting short-term MACE, while 70 × URL was better for long-term MACE. For high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hscTn I), the optimal threshold was higher, at 307 × URL, for predicting short-term MACE. Conclusion: Isolated hscTn elevations after cardiac surgery have prognostic significance, with distinct optimal cut-off values for hscTnT and hscTnI. A more accurate and standardised PMI definition incorporating isolated elevations in hscTn is needed, though this is challenging due to the heterogeneous nature of cardiac surgical procedures.

Received:

Accepted:

Published online:

Disclosure: CZ is supported by Science and Technology Department of Jilin Province (20250205014GH). DJH is supported by the Duke-NUS Signature Research Programme funded by the Ministry of Health, Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council under its Singapore Translational Research Investigator Award (MOH-STaR21jun-0003), Centre Grant scheme (NMRC CG21 APR1006), Collaborative Centre Grant scheme (NMRC/CG21APRC006) and the
CArdiovascular DiseasE National Collaborative Enterprise (CADENCE) National Clinical Translational Program (MOH-001277-01). All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Correspondence: Derek J Hausenloy, Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Rd, Singapore 169857. E: derek.hausenloy@duke-nus.edu.sg

Copyright:

© The Author(s). This work is open access and is licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0. Users may copy, redistribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is cited correctly.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is one of the most important therapeutic strategies for patients with multivessel CAD. Despite recent advancements in surgical techniques, CABG still causes significant mortality and morbidity, especially given the ageing population and increasing prevalence of risk factors such as diabetes, obesity, chronic kidney disease and hypertension. Among the many factors associated with worse clinical outcomes after CABG, the occurrence of procedural MI (PMI; type 5 MI) is a critical determinant of clinical outcomes. The most sensitive and specific cardiac biomarkers for detecting PMI are serum elevations of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hscTn), which is released from cardiomyocytes following injury. It comprises two isoforms: high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hscTnT) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hscTnI). Both are highly specific to the myocardium, enabling their use as biomarkers for assessing PMI following cardiac surgery.

Current definitions of PMI following cardiac surgery in the Fourth Universal Definition of MI (UDMI) or by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) or Academic Research Consortium (ARC)-2 have been based on diagnostic criteria rather than prognostic ones, with cut-off cardiac troponin (cTn) thresholds arbitrarily chosen because of a lack of available evidence when these definitions were proposed. 1–3 Despite this, a number of clinical studies and meta-analyses have reported that, providing the procedural elevation in cTn is accompanied by new evidence of ischaemia, these definitions for PMI are prognostically important, impacting on short- and long-term clinical outcomes following cardiac surgery.4

Current definitions of PMI require the presence of new evidence of ischaemia, but this can be challenging to ascertain following cardiac surgery, given the difficulties in assessing chest pain and ECGs, along with diagnosing ECG and imaging evidence of new ischaemia. As such, a number of clinical studies and meta-analyses have investigated the prognostic impact of PMI following cardiac surgery as defined by isolated elevations in cardiac biomarkers such as creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) and cTn. These have been associated with worse short- and long-term clinical outcomes, but the specific cut-off thresholds for defining prognostic PMI are not clear.

The Fourth UDMI criteria for defining procedural myocardial injury require a cTn value >99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) during the first 48 hours following cardiac surgery, occurring from a normal baseline cTn value. However, based on this definition, the vast majority of patients undergoing cardiac surgery will experience procedural myocardial injury.5 To address this, higher cut-off thresholds for isolated elevations in standard cTn and CK-MB in the 48-hour post-procedure period have been proposed to indicate the presence of prognostically significant procedural myocardial injury following cardiac surgery.2,3,6 Several studies have evaluated the prognostic impact of isolated hscTn elevations on short- and long-term clinical outcomes and have proposed much higher cut-off thresholds for defining PMI that have prognostic significance and may be used to guide patient management and be used as clinical endpoints in future cardiac surgery trials. However, the cut-off thresholds of hscTn elevation do vary depending on the type of cardiac surgery performed, the timing of the blood sampling and whether hscTnT or hscTnI are used. Hence, it is challenging to propose a single cut-off threshold for defining prognostic elevations in hscTn post-cardiac surgery.7 Therefore, there is a need for a more universally accepted and widely used diagnostic and prognostic criteria for PMI in CABG.

The current systematic review has two aims. The first is to summarise the current available evidence using hscTn to evaluate the presence of PMI, by estimating the accuracy of hscTn according to sensitivity and specificity. The second is to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic cut-off thresholds for defining PMI after CABG.

Methods

Literature Search

A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library until December 2024. The literature search was confined to English publications with no region restriction. The detailed literature search strategy is provided in the Supplementary Material.

Study Selection and Inclusion

After removing duplicates, two researchers independently screened the titles and abstracts of the remaining records to select articles for full-text assessment. Any discrepancies were resolved through a group meeting with a third investigator. To ensure completeness, the reference lists of the included studies were meticulously reviewed and a citation search was also conducted on all eligible studies.

The inclusion criteria were as follows: participants were adults with PMI and high-sensitivity troponin tests after CABG or CABG concomitant with valve surgery; the index was the high-sensitivity troponin test; the target condition was PMI; and the study types were randomised controlled trials or observational studies (cross-sectional or longitudinal). The following were excluded: articles written in languages other than English; reviews, comments, protocols, editorials, letters, case reports, or animal trials; studies without hscTn to define PMI; and studies with sample sizes <20.

Data Extraction

Studies that met our inclusion criteria and those from which complete information about diagnostic and prognostic value could be derived were selected for inclusion. Data extraction was initially conducted by two independent reviewers via a standardised Excel (Microsoft) table. Basic characteristics including the first author, year of publication and country where the study was performed were extracted.

Results

Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria; 20 studies used hscTnT and seven used hscTnI. The flow chart of the literature search and included studies is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Flow Chart of the Literature Search and Included Studies

Article image

High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

The characteristics and major findings for hscTnT in PMI diagnosis after CABG are listed in Supplementary Table 1.4,8–26 Among the studies, there were 10 retrospective studies, six randomised clinical trials and four prospective observational studies. There were multiple types of CABG, including on-pump CABG (the majority), off-pump CABG and CABG concomitant with valve surgery. All studies used the Elecsys hscTnT assay (Roche), except one German study that used the ENZYMUN assay (Roche).

The diagnostic values of hscTnT in predicting short-term outcomes in CABG are listed in Table 1. The primary outcomes include operative mortality, 30-day mortality, in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), 30-day adverse events, postoperative in-hospital complications and Type 5 MI. The cut-off range, area under the curve (AUC) and 95% CI, reported sensitivity, specificity and Youden J value are listed. The seven studies listed in Table 1 report eight cut-off ranges. Based on the reported data, 120 × URL had the highest sensitivity (100%) in predicting type 5 MI, while 100 × URL had the highest specificity (99%). Regarding Youden J (sensitivity + specificity-1), 120 × URL had the highest diagnostic value.

Table 1: High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Thresholds for In-hospital or 30-day Mortality Prediction in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Article image

The prognostic value of hscTnT for short-term mortality prediction in CABG is shown in Table 2. Three studies were included; two defined the primary outcome as 1-year mortality and one as 180-day mortality. Based on the current reported data, 35 × URL had the highest sensitivity for predicting 1-year all-cause mortality (84%) and 170 × URL had the highest specificity. Regarding Youden J, 70 × URL had the highest Youden J index.

The prognostic value of hscTnT in predicting short-term and mid-term outcomes is shown in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3 for different reported cut-off ranges. For short-term mortality and 1-year all-cause mortality, 170 × URL and 70 x URL had the highest OR, respectively.

Table 2: High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Thresholds for Short-term Mortality Prediction in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Article image

High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Seven studies reported the diagnostic and prognostic value of hscTnI after CABG surgery; most were published after 2022. The basic characteristics are listed in Supplementary Table 4.27–33 Among the seven studies, six were retrospective and one was prospective. Most studies used the ARCHITECT STAT (Abbott) hscTnI immunoassay; one study used the hscTnI assay by Beckman Coulter.

Regarding short-term outcome prediction (Table 3), four studies reported sensitivity and specificity. Among them, 80 × URL had the highest sensitivity, while 307 × URL had the highest specificity. Regarding the Youden J index, 307 × URL had the highest diagnostic value. Up to the end date of the literature search, no data have been available concerning the application of hscTnI in predicting long-term outcomes.

Regarding short-term outcome prediction assessment (Supplementary Table 3), three studies were available for data extraction and 500 × URL had the highest OR for outcome prediction. Regarding long-term outcome assessment, one study demonstrated that 36 × URL was predictive of the risk of 1-year mortality (Supplementary Table 4).

Table 3: High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Thresholds for in-Hospital or 30-day Mortality Prediction in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Article image

Discussion

Summary of Evidence

The findings of this review underscore the need for a more universal definition for PMI diagnosis using hscTn. As is well known, the profiles of hscTn release are surgery type-, patient- and comorbidity-specific. These observations align with previous literature, highlighting the need for a universally accepted definition of PMI.4–7

Significance of High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin in Diagnosing PMI after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

PMI is defined as an isolated elevation in cardiac biomarkers above the URL in the 48-hour postoperative period. Because of the nature of cardiac surgery, this level of cardiac biomarker elevation occurs in virtually all patients undergoing CABG surgery. As in cardiac surgery, the nature of the CABG surgery involves multiple manipulations, all of which may lead to increases in biomarkers.

Recent high-sensitivity assays have demonstrated that cardiac troponin levels are increased in many diseases affecting the myocardium and offer crucial prognostic data. Many studies have shown that the hscTnT assay has better diagnostic and prognostic accuracy than the traditional troponin T assay in a variety of patient populations with cardiovascular diseases.34 The pattern of change in biomarkers can help in distinguishing graft-related and non-graft-related failure after cardiac surgery.7

Defining the Threshold for PMI Diagnosis

Different definitions and criteria will lead to different analysis outcomes. As such, there is an urgent need for a universal definition that can apply to different clinical scenarios. The diagnostic criteria for different types of cardiac surgeries vary. In addition, the studies vary in terms of the surgery type, concomitant procedures, timing used to define the end points and timing of the hscTn test, as well as the assay of hscTn, the underlying complexity of the disease and whether patients had experienced previous MI within 30 days.

Current definitions recommend cardiac troponin values >10, 35 and 70 × URL after CABG procedures (with or without additional new signs of ischaemia) for the diagnosis of PMI.35 Recent studies provide evidence that thresholds for cardiac biomarkers defining PMI used in most consensus statements are too low to predict mortality after cardiac surgery.4,26,27,30,36 This is consistent with our observations.

The large international VISION cardiac surgery study evaluated the prognostic impact of hscTnI elevations within the postoperative 24-hour period on 30-day mortality in 13,862 cardiac surgery patients recruited from 24 hospitals in 12 countries.27 The authors found that the >10 × URL threshold was exceeded in 98% of patients and that the ≥35 × URL and ≥70 × URL thresholds were exceeded in 89% and 75% of patients, respectively, confirming that the cut-off thresholds in cTn elevation used for defining PMI in the Fourth UDMI and SCAI are too low. Interestingly, the 24-hour hscTnI threshold associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality was >210 × URL after isolated CABG or aortic valve replacement; this decreased to 59 × URL at days 2 and 3 post-surgery. For other cardiac surgeries, the 24-hour hscTnI threshold was 499 × URL; this decreased to 96 × URL at days 2 and 3 post-surgery. In a subsequent large, single-centre cohort study of 8,292 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the hscTnT cut-off peak value within 72 hours of surgery associated with 30-day mortality varied from 41 × URL for aortic valve replacement, to 134 × URL for other cardiac surgery and to 170 × URL for isolated CABG surgery.26 Furthermore, higher troponin levels were observed at all postoperative timepoints in on-pump CABG than in off-pump CABG surgeries. Interestingly, elevations in hscTnT above this prognostic cut-off were associated with an increase in 5-year mortality for patients receiving CABG and other cardiac surgery, but not for those receiving aortic valve replacement. A recent study investigated the impact of postoperative hscTnI elevations within 48 hours and their implications for postoperative clinical decision making in 4,684 consecutive patients undergoing elective isolated CABG at a single centre.30 The authors found that 161 patients (3.5%) underwent invasive coronary angiography after surgery, of whom 86 (53.4%) underwent repeat revascularisation. An optimal cut-off value for peak hscTnI of >500 × URL was significantly associated with repeat revascularisation within 48 hours after surgery, 30-day MACE and all-cause mortality after a median follow-up of 3.1 years. Interestingly, the addition of serial hscTnI measurements showed no additional benefit in patients with electrocardiographic or echocardiographic abnormalities or haemodynamic instability. Early postoperative hscTnI elevations (before 12 hours) also had a low yield for clinical decision-making; only later elevations (at 12–16 hours postoperatively) using a threshold of 307 × URL were significantly associated with repeat revascularisation with an area under the curve of 0.92.

Following cardiac surgery, PMI due to graft-related and non-graft-related failures have different mechanisms and patterns of biomarker release.31 This suggests that surgery-, sex-, time- and comorbidity-specific cut-off values are necessary for clinical significance, highlighting the necessity for distinct cardiac biomarker cut-off values tailored to each strategy, based on clinically significant outcomes rather than arbitrary thresholds.

Study Limitations

The study has several limitations. The study is a systematic review without meta-analysis. More evidence is needed to perform a high-quality meta-analysis. Other types of cardiac surgeries (valvular heart surgery, aortic surgery and heart transplantation) were not included in the systematic review. Given the lack of available literature and the differences in cardiac surgical populations (background risk of mortality), surgery types, assays, timing of assay and so on, it is challenging to define cut-off prognostic thresholds of hscTn. Furthermore, the optimal threshold level of hscTn elevation that provides optimal sensitivity and specificity regarding PMI after cardiac surgery has not been defined.

Future Directions

The utmost priority is to establish a universally accepted diagnostic and prognostic threshold for PMI. Current studies use heterogeneous cut-off values, often derived from small cohorts without accounting for variables such as age, renal function or surgical technique. Future multicentre studies should employ large, diverse populations to validate thresholds adjusted for baseline troponin levels and comorbidities.

In the era of multimodality diagnostic tools and rapid development of artificial intelligence, a combined model of biomarker, CT angiography, MRI and echocardiographic data would be helpful in addressing this problem. Combining hscTn with advanced imaging (e.g. cardiac MRI for late gadolinium enhancement) or novel biomarkers may differentiate ischaemic necrosis from reversible injury and from graft-related and non-graft-related PMI.37 Additionally, intraoperative factors, such as haemodynamic changes (e.g. low blood pressure, low cardiac output and low oxygenation, etc.), transit-time flowmetry linking intraoperative graft quality with postoperative troponin kinetics profiles, may help address this crucial clinical problem.38,39 Based on the current literature, elevated postoperative hscTn levels are associated with short-term adverse outcomes; however, the long-term morbidity and follow-up results need to be further validated. Validation of long-term results should be incorporated in large cohorts with longer follow-up periods.

Procedural Myocardial Injury and Infarction as a Clinical Trial Endpoint

The choice of definition of PMI has been shown to influence the outcome of several recent clinical trials including ISCHEMIA, SYNTAXES and EXCEL.40–42 This underscores the need to have a universal definition of PMI following either percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery that can be used as clinical endpoints for trial comparing outcomes between PCI and cardiac surgery. As such, further research is needed to better define PMI when used as a primary composite endpoint in clinical trials; however, which definition should be used needs further study. Although ARC-2- and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) SCmodel-defined PMI are more specific and thus more prognostic for cardiac death, the Fourth UDMI definition is more sensitive for detecting events and remain independently associated with cardiac mortality.36 More data from adequately powered cohorts are needed to compare prognosis of PMI among PCI and cardiac surgery patients across definitions to allow a fair comparison of event rates in a clinical trial.

Conclusion

HscTn has been proven to be of diagnostic and prognostic value for PMI after CABG. Overall, 120 × URL and 70 × URL of hscTnT are the most effective cut-off values for diagnosing PMI for short-term and long-term MACE after CABG, respectively. The optimal threshold value for hscTnI is 307 × URL for diagnosing short-term MACE. To conclude, despite accumulating evidence, there are still no universally accepted definitions and diagnostic criteria for PMI after cardiac surgery. Such universally accepted and accurate definitions supported by robust evidence are urgently needed, although this will be challenging given the heterogeneity of cardiac surgery.

Click here to view Supplementary Material.

Clinical Perspective

  • The occurrence of procedural MI (PMI) is a critical determinant of clinical outcomes following cardiac surgery.
  • Although elevations in blood levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin following cardiac surgery have been associated with worse clinical outcomes, the optimal diagnostic and prognostic cut-off values for defining prognostic PMI remain uncertain.
  • However, defining the prognostic cut-off thresholds for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin elevation following cardiac surgery remains challenging given the varying conditions such as the type of surgery, the underlying patient risk, the troponin assay used and the timing of the assay.

References

  1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J 2019;40:237–69. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  2. Moussa ID, Klein LW, Shah B, et al. Consideration of a new definition of clinically relevant myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1563–70. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  3. Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, et al. Standardized end point definitions for coronary intervention trials: the Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. Circulation 2018;137:2635–50. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  4. Pölzl L, Thielmann M, Cymorek S, et al. Impact of myocardial injury after coronary artery bypass grafting on long-term prognosis. Eur Heart J 2022;43:2407–17. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  5. Silvain J, Zeitouni M, Paradies V, et al. Procedural myocardial injury, infarction and mortality in patients undergoing elective PCI: a pooled analysis of patient-level data. Eur Heart J 2021;42:323–34. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  6. Thielmann M, Sharma V, Al-Attar N, et al. ESC Joint Working Groups on cardiovascular surgery and the cellular biology of the heart position paper: peri-operative myocardial injury and infarction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2392–407. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  7. Gaudino M, Flather M, Capodanno D, et al. European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) expert consensus statement on perioperative myocardial infarction after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2024;65:ezad415. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  8. Lucchinetti E, Bestmann L, Feng J, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning applied during isoflurane inhalation provides no benefit to the myocardium of patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: lack of synergy or evidence of antagonism in cardioprotection? Anesthesiology 2012;116:296–310. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  9. Wang TK, Stewart RA, Ramanathan T, et al. Diagnosis of MI after CABG with high-sensitivity troponin T and new ECG or echocardiogram changes: relationship with mortality and validation of the universal definition of MI. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2013;2:323–33. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  10. Candilio L, Malik A, Ariti C, et al. Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Heart (Br Card Soc) 2015;101:185–92. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  11. Giannopoulos G, Angelidis C, Kouritas VK, et al. Usefulness of colchicine to reduce perioperative myocardial damage in patients who underwent on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 2015;115:1376–81. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  12. Hausenloy DJ, Candilio L, Evans R, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning and outcomes of cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2015;373:1408–17. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  13. Sharma V, Zheng H, Candilio L, et al. Defining peri-operative myocardial injury during cardiac surgery using high-sensitivity troponin T. J Clin Med 2023;12:4291. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  14. Petäjä L, Røsjø H, Mildh L, et al. Predictive value of high-sensitivity troponin T in addition to EuroSCORE II in cardiac surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016;23:133–41. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  15. Mauermann E, Bolliger D, Fassl J, et al. Postoperative high-sensitivity troponin and its association with 30-day and 12-month, all-cause mortality in patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2017;125:1110–7. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  16. Mehdiani A, Akhyari P, Kamiya H, et al. Prognostic value of the new high sensitive cardiac troponin T assay (hs-cTnT) after coronary artery bypass grafting. Acta Cardiol 2017;72:276–83. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  17. Gahl B, Göber V, Odutayo A, et al. Prognostic value of early postoperative troponin T in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e007743. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  18. Machado MN, Rodrigues FB, Grigolo IH, et al. Early prognostic value of high-sensitivity troponin T after coronary artery bypass grafting. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019;67:467–74. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  19. Wongthep A, Karunasumetta C, Tourthong W, Senarak P. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai 2020;103:1–7.
  20. Nellipudi JA, Baker RA, Dykes L, et al. Prognostic value of high-sensitivity troponin T after on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart Lung Circ 2021;30:1562–9. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  21. Niclauss L, Pfister R, Delay D, et al. Usefulness of postoperative high-sensitive troponin T measurement and implications for defining type 5 infarction. J Card Surg 2022;37:151–61. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  22. Hamarneh A, Ho AFW, Bulluck H, et al. Negative interaction between nitrates and remote ischemic preconditioning in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: the ERIC-GTN and ERICCA studies. Basic Res Cardiol 2022;117:31. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  23. Zhou S, Diehl R, Sessler DI, et al. Procedure-specific relationships between postoperative troponin T and a composite of mortality and low cardiac output syndrome: a retrospective cohort analysis. Anesth Analg 2022;134:1260–9. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  24. Kokoefer A, Cozowicz C, Wernly B, Rodemund N. Timing and threshold of high sensitive troponin T measurement for the prediction of mortality after cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis. Intensive Care Med Exp 2023;11:58. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  25. Liang JW, Zhou M, Jin YQ, et al. High-sensitivity troponin T levels before and after cardiac surgery and the 30-day mortality: a retrospective cohort study. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023;10:1276035. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  26. Poelzl L, Engler C, Sterzinger P, et al. Association of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T with 30-day and 5-year mortality after cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023;82:1301–12. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  27. Devereaux PJ, Lamy A, Chan MTV, et al. High-sensitivity troponin I after cardiac surgery and 30-day mortality. N Engl J Med 2022;386:827–36. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  28. Li SS, Nan WH, Yin Y, et al. The latest cutoff value of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (access hs-TnI) for major adverse cardiac events during the perioperative period of coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective study from a single heart center. Lab Med 2022;46:165–70. 
    Crossref
  29. Nanni S, Garofalo M, Schinzari M, et al. Prognostic value of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I early after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg 2022;17:280. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  30. Omran H, Deutsch MA, Groezinger E, et al. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I after coronary artery bypass grafting for post-operative decision-making. Eur Heart J 2022;43:2388–403. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  31. Friedman T, Leviner DB, Chan V, et al. High sensitivity troponin-I threshold to predict perioperative myocardial infarction. J Cardiothorac Surg 2023;18:234. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  32. Reddy P, Cellamare M, Merdler I, et al. Markedly elevated high-sensitivity troponin and in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2024;68:57–61. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  33. Wang J, Wang P, Liu H, et al. Impact of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I elevation after on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on long-term prognosis. Can J Cardiol 2025;41:294–305. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  34. Salama A, Ibrahim G, Fikry M, et al. Prognostic value of high-sensitive troponin T in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement surgery. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024;40:142–50. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  35. Polzl L, Thielmann M, Sterzinger P, et al. Sex-specific troponin and creatine kinase thresholds after coronary bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2025;119:120–8. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  36. Ueki Y, Otsuka T, Bär S, et al. Frequency and outcomes of periprocedural MI in patients with chronic coronary syndromes undergoing PCI. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;79:513–26. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  37. Heuts S, Gollmann-Tepeköylü C, Denessen EJS, et al. Cardiac troponin release following coronary artery bypass grafting: mechanisms and clinical implications. Eur Heart J 2023;44:100–12. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  38. Amin S, Werner RS, Madsen PL, et al. Intraoperative bypass graft flow measurement with transit time flowmetry: a clinical assessment. Ann Thorac Surg 2018;106:532–8. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  39. Gaudino M, Sandner S, Di Giammarco G, et al. The use of intraoperative transit time flow measurement for coronary artery bypass surgery: systematic review of the evidence and expert opinion statements. Circulation 2021;144:1160–71. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  40. Chaitman BR, Alexander KP, Cyr DD, et al. Myocardial infarction in the ischemia trial: impact of different definitions on incidence, prognosis, and treatment comparisons. Circulation 2021;143:790–804. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  41. Hara H, Serruys PW, Takahashi K, et al. Impact of peri-procedural myocardial infarction on outcomes after revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:1622–39. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  42. Gregson J, Stone GW, Ben-Yehuda O, et al. Implications of alternative definitions of peri-procedural myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:1609–21. 
    Crossref | PubMed